
I'm not sure what you're getting at, shouldn't this be in a science magazine. . -Rob King
Reply

The research is not important enough to be in a science magazine and the prose style is too emotive. . -Paul Somerset
Reply

Emotive is a good word for nature. We need to jump up and down. But yeah perhaps we also need people to become involved in saving our nature on mass. Voting green is great but we need everyone in the world to get active and start doing something to save whats left. Stop the greed and get on with it. . -Michael Florrimell
Reply

For many people nature is not a lovely thing or a wonderful ideal and it never will be. For many it is a source of income, you can't just walk into places like Eden or Manjinup and tell the people there that they have to all go and do something else. If you want to protect nature you would be better off calculating the value of services provided by areas of natural habitat (air and water purification etc) and lay out a strictly economic arguement. . -Paul Somerset
Reply

How can you say nature is not cute and wonderful? If you watch the Crocodile Hunter, Flipper, or Skippy you can see just how cute and wonderful it is. Nature comes with a nice soundtrack and dialogue. You don't even have to touch the televsion if you have a remote. If nature gets boring you can always watch something high-powered and exciting like the cricket or survivor. . -Jim Brodie
Reply

I'm desesperatly looking to talk to Jim Brodie. Are you still in Australia? Would appreciate an answer Thanks Write me at korovo@yahoo.com . -Sebastien Hudon
Reply

The bottom line for the Greens is social justice. They say fair, just and equitable society is the prerequesite to protecting the environment. . -Paul Somerset
Reply

The bottom line for people is to go stand in a forest and see if they wont to do something about saving the natural world. Plenty of people look outside the bus window going through a natural enviroment but don't get out and touch the ground. Its about time they did. Its good for you. . -Bob Brown
Reply

I was interested in the way our species is systematically scrutinising every the physical world. I didn't think this work was much to do with saving forests. Theres also some questions about where you find print, media and art these days. . -Paul Somerset
Reply

Printmedia is most likely to be the place where most people see nature eg National Geographic Magazine. . -Susan Hollingsworth
Reply

Printmedia in its mass form is there to inform the mass as to whats going on. The mass don't care if the facts are real or not. They just want to think eg nature is green and everything on the planet is A ok. . -Ken Clark
Reply

Paul, This reminds me of current work and the last stage of each research project - accountability through measuring and graphing the success of each stage of the project. Data presentation is always praised if it looks like a designer art work, often without regard to the written contents, just as long as it looks good or nice - then that's good enough mate! Art and design play a large role in today's technological, ordinary, work places which are more like glass fish tanks in space devoid of any place for anything GREEN (as green equals dirt). You inspire me to go out right now and research something for a nice graphic art work! . -Michael Zschech
Reply

Interesting comment on the art and design factor within our work places.Maybe the someone designing the programs came from oneof these backgrounds, does that make artists and designers the real rulers of the world. . -Michael Florrimell
Reply

Michael, Of course - all you have to do is to have faith and believe without doubting and it then exists as you live it practically. Money can't buy it! . -Michael Zschech
Reply

I'm always suprised how hard people are on our scientists. The thing about science is that it has to be right, their theories have to explain how our world works. Artists, at least the academic types, do not make very much sense to anyone. Thats why no one much wants to look at our work. . -Paul Somerset
Reply

Paul, in a back handed sort of way, that is a complement because you are non conforming to art commercialism, and being original, cutting edge and inventive. However, praise is great to recieve. . -Michael Zschech
Reply

No Praise here please. Science maybe if they started getting things wrong then we might start learning something useful about the world we live in. I mean all this Mars business how about the world we live in now. Thinking about a meaning ful life on mars ho ho ho. Stop the rubbish and start cleaning up our own world to start with. Science a lot like art to many dreamers not enough doers. . -Michael Florrimell
Reply

Michael, personally I feel like praising and thanking people, MORE AND MORE, as apposed to "chopping the tall OZ poppy down syndrome" - culture change chat time. . -Michael Zschech
Reply

Mars? You are confusing media with science. . -Rob
Reply

Rob,"horse and carriage time?" . -Michael Zschech
Reply

Maybe a solar car could help. Sceince does come up with good concepts now and again its just the greedy pollies and corps who stick to the ways of destroying thhe world for a bit more cash sack the lot of them. . -Michael Florrimell
Reply

I aggree with Michael Z. More praise, less bagging people out. . -Paul Somerset
Reply

Paul, someone once told me that "PRAISE WAS THE KEY TO THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN". I believe them, because of the numerous practical situations I have applied it to. I have seen the results. Brown- Noseing is the opposite to Praise. . -Michael Zschech
Reply

Rob, I could be wrong. . -Michael Zschech
Reply

No the praise bit is dead on in my opinion it was the solar car / greedy pollies bit that I was eh?ing . -Rob
Reply

Rob, keep on eh?ing! . -Michael Zschech
Reply

Ok enough erhing get back to greedy pollies. John and the gang are stirring the pot more and more bastards what are we going to do about them. Labour need a face lift the Demos are fighting in house and Green are chomping at the bit without enough backing. M1 the people for president of Australia. Get rid of all pollies now. . -Michael Florrimell
Reply

Make sense not war! . -Rob
Reply

Vehemence in Men can be such a turnoff. Alone. Without other motive. No Ehring here please,. Science n Religious Feeling were the two things that were once not separated. PRAISE Art, then we had to stuff it up by delegating power/thus pollies/policies/people n wars. It was so much simpler when we acknowledged the other tribe just may want AND TAKE what the Other lot had. Paul is making his statement in an honest as in (not)(dis)honest way. I can respect that.. . -FaNaNa
Reply